Git: How do I list only local branches?

git branch -a shows both remote and local branches.

git branch -r shows remote branches.

Is there a way to list just the local branches?

11 Answers

Just git branch without options.

From the manpage:

With no arguments, existing branches are listed and the current branch will be highlighted with an asterisk.

9

Just the plain command

git branch

0

git branch -a - All branches.

git branch -r - Remote branches only.

git branch - Local branches only.

0

One of the most straightforward ways to do it is

git for-each-ref --format='%(refname:short)' refs/heads/

This works perfectly for scripts as well.

2

If the leading asterisk is a problem, I pipe the git branch as follows

git branch | awk -F ' +' '! /\(no branch\)/ {print $2}'

This also eliminates the '(no branch)' line that shows up when you have detached head.

2

Here's how to list local branches that do not have a remote branch in origin with the same name:

git branch | sed 's|* | |' | sort > local
git branch -r | sed 's|origin/||' | sort > remote
comm -23 local remote

1

Other way for get a list just local branch is:

git branch -a | grep -v 'remotes'

0

There's a great answer to a post about how to delete local-only branches. In it, the following builds a command to list out the local branches:

git branch -vv | cut -c 3- | awk '$3 !~/\[/ { print $1 }'

The answer has a great explanation about how this command was derived, so I would suggest you go and read that post.

1

To complement gertvdijk's answer - I'm adding few screenshots in case it helps someone quick.

In my Git Bash shell if I run below command:

git branch

This command (without parameters) shows all my local branches. The current branch which is currently checked out is shown in different color (green) along with an asterisk (*) prefix which is really intuitive.

When you try to see all branches including the remote branches using -a(stands for all) parameter:

git branch -a

Then remote branches which aren't checked out yet are also shown in different (red) color:

0

Use:

git show-ref --heads

The answer by gertvdijk is the most concise and elegant, but this may help grasp the idea that refs/heads/* are equivalent to local branches.

Most of the time the refs/heads/master ref is a file at .git/refs/heads/master that contains a Git commit hash that points to the Git object that represents the current state of your local master branch, so each file under .git/refs/heads/* represents a local branch.

PowerShell users can use its Compare-Object cmdlet to do something like this:

function match-branch { $localBranches = ((git branch -l) -replace "\*", "") -replace " ", "" $remoteBranches = (((git branch -r) -replace "\*", "") -replace " ", "") -replace "origin/", "" Compare-Object -ReferenceObject $localBranches -DifferenceObject $remoteBranches -IncludeEqual | Select-Object @{Label = "branch"; Expression = { $_.InputObject } }, @{Label = ”both”; Expression = { $_.SideIndicator -eq "==" } }, @{Label = ”remoteOnly”; Expression = { $_.SideIndicator -eq "=>" } }, @{Label = ”localOnly”; Expression = { $_.SideIndicator -eq "<=" } }
}

Example Output

branch both remoteOnly localOnly
------ ---- ---------- ---------
master True False False
HEAD->master False True False
renamed False True False

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password Submit

Post as a guest

Post Your Answer Discard

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy